In a well-publicized decision, a New York State judge struck down New York City Mayor Bloomberg’s attempt to limit the sale of super-sized sugary drinks. Although the opinion focused on separation of powers, the judge also held the restriction lacked a rational basis. He found it arbitrary because there was no limitation on small-cup refills, some high-calorie drinks were unregulated and retail food stores were not controlled.
As law students are taught, rational basis is the lowest level of judicial scrutiny. It is rarely a ground for invalidating health and safety laws. Courts defer to the wisdom of the democratically elected branches, at least where no fundamental liberty interest is at stake. Obviously, there is no such interest here. To quote a former vice-presidential nominee, what is regulated in New York City is "just pop."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
