Pennsylvania's refusal to transfer defendant to New Jersey because of his parole-violator-pending status did not violate the Interstate Agreement on Detainers.
May 14, 2013 at 04:12 AM
1 minute read
State v. Perry, A-0465-11T4; Appellate Division; opinion by Alvarez, J.A.D.; decided and approved for publication May 10, 2013. Before Judges Alvarez, Waugh and St. John. On appeal from the Law Division, Warren County, Indictment No. 08-05-0208. DDS No. 14-2-9916 [11 pp.]
In November 2007, while on parole in Pennsylvania, defendant John Perry was arrested there on new charges and placed on parole-violation-pending (PVP) status.
Presented by BigVoodoo
This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.
Recognizing innovation in the legal technology sector for working on precedent-setting, game-changing projects and initiatives.
Legalweek New York explores Business and Regulatory Trends, Technology and Talent drivers impacting law firms.
McCarter & English is actively seeking a 5th-6th year trademark associate who has trademark prosecution, licensing and litigation experi...
DESCRIPTION: The Metropolitan Transportation Authority ( MTA ) hereby solicits proposals from law firms, including sole practitioners, to pr...
The Partners Group is currently recruiting a VP of Legal for our burgeoning client, a real estate investment firm in Atlanta, GA. The firm h...
