A New Jersey appeals court ruling on Wednesday illustrates the type of doctor-patient arbitration agreement that can withstand judicial scrutiny for procedural unconscionability.
The decision in Moore v. Woman to Woman Obstetrics & Gynecology, A-0683-11, means the mother of a child born with Downs Syndrome must submit her malpractice claims to arbitration.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
