The past term of labor and employment decisions was characterized not by major shifts of policy or changes in the law, but by refinement and clarification of prior decisions, and useful practical guidance for employment litigators and trial courts conducting employment law trials.
Battaglia v. United Parcel Service
The court’s decision in Battaglia v. United Parcel Service, No. 069405 (N.J. July 17, 2013), has been widely reported for its holding that protected activity for a retaliation claim under the New Jersey Law Against Discrimination (LAD) need not constitute an LAD violation in itself. But three other holdings of Battaglia will perhaps be even more significant in their impact on the conduct of trials of LAD and Conscientious Employee Protection Act (CEPA) claims.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
