The trial court did not err by failing to sua sponte instruct the jury on accomplice liability as none of the evidence could support a finding that he acted as an accomplice rather than a principal.
October 17, 2013 at 02:27 PM
1 minute read
State v. Maloney, A-64 September Term 2011; Supreme Court; opinion by Rodriguez, P.J.A.D., temporarily assigned; dissent by Albin, J.; decided October 16, 2013. On certification to the Appellate Division. [Sat below: Judges Fuentes and Gilroy in the Appellate Division; Judge Nieves in the Law Division.] DDS No. 14-1-1654 [34 pp.]
Defendant Osborne Maloney was charged with attempted murder and related charges stemming from the robbery of the home of Syoma (Sam) and Rita Shnayder.
Presented by BigVoodoo
This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.
Recognizing innovation in the legal technology sector for working on precedent-setting, game-changing projects and initiatives.
Legalweek New York explores Business and Regulatory Trends, Technology and Talent drivers impacting law firms.
McCarter & English is actively seeking a 5th-6th year trademark associate who has trademark prosecution, licensing and litigation experi...
DESCRIPTION: The Metropolitan Transportation Authority ( MTA ) hereby solicits proposals from law firms, including sole practitioners, to pr...
The Partners Group is currently recruiting a VP of Legal for our burgeoning client, a real estate investment firm in Atlanta, GA. The firm h...
