We strongly support the jury trial innovations that are reflected in N.J. Court Rule 1:8-8, and specifically the ability of the court to provide jurors with written copies of the trial judge’s instructions on the law of the case, the ability of the court to allow jurors to take notes and the ability of the court to allow jurors to ask questions. In fact, we would go one step further and require that these aids to the jury be uniformly required.

Studies in other jurisdictions that have already adopted the uniform provision of written instructions to the jury have found that there is less trial time taken by requests for read-backs and requests for re-instruction on points of law. We ask the state Supreme Court to consider a rule requiring written instructions designed to communicate, educate and reinforce recollection be furnished to jurors in all cases. We cannot imagine a case where distribution of the trial judge’s instructions would not assist the jury to make intelligent decisions under the correct law and standard of proof.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]