A judge in a criminal trial can’t replace a juror to break a deadlock during deliberations, but what if a juror who may be the holdout claims to be ill?
The New Jersey Supreme Court heard arguments Monday in a case that tests whether a defendant, convicted after a fresh juror was substituted for an allegedly sick one on a stymied panel, was denied a fair trial.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]