The LGBT movement has sometimes been described as this generation’s civil rights movement. As societal norms continue to shape the social landscape, so too do the opinions of the courts when it comes to issues affecting the LGBT community. In that vein, there are two recent decisions from federal courts, one locally and one in California, which are helping to shape the legal landscape.
The first is a decision handed down by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, which covers most of the nation’s West Coast, including California, which has been known to render a landmark decision or two. In the matter of SmithKline Beecham d/b/a GlaxoSmithKline v. Abbott Laboratories, No. 11-17357, (9th Cir. Jan. 21, 2014), the appellate court in San Francisco held that a gay man was improperly excluded from being a juror in a civil trial because of his sexual orientation. In so holding, the court held that “permitting a strike based on sexual orientation would send the false message that gays and lesbians could not be trusted to reason fairly on issues of great import to the community or the nation.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
