The New Jersey Supreme Court heard arguments Monday on whether a judgment of acquittal was the correct remedy for a DWI defendant convicted based on evidence elicited not at trial but in a pretrial suppression hearing.
The Appellate Division so ordered in State v. Gibson, but a prosecutor said the proper course is a retrial—even though no first trial had occurred.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
