The New Jersey Supreme Court has agreed to decide whether a U.S. Supreme Court ruling on the necessity of warrants for blood draws in drunken-driving cases only reaches future matters.
The court granted a petition for certification in a case hinging on the retroactivity of Missouri v. McNeely, 133 S.Ct. 152 (2013), where the justices said a blood draw amounts to a search and dissipation of alcohol in the bloodstream by itself does not qualify as an exigent circumstance to skirt the warrant requirement.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
