A federal civil rights suit over termination of a father’s parental rights was wrongly dismissed based on the outcome of a related state court case, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit has ruled.
The father’s suit in U.S. District Court in Newark, Mazzetti v. Wood, 13-2095, was dismissed based on the Rooker-Feldman doctrine, which says a district court may not exercise jurisdiction over a case by a party who loses a state court proceeding and invites federal court review of that judgment. The district court analysis focused on whether the federal court suit was “inextricably intertwined” with proceedings in Bergen County Superior Court, where Dennis Mazzetti’s parental rights were terminated.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
