CONTRACTS
11-2-4632 Ratiewicz v. Jimoh, App. Div. (per curiam) (4 pp.) Defendant appeals from a Special Civil Part order granting a $1,300 judgment against him for the purchase of a vacuum cleaner from plaintiff. The panel affirms, finding no reason to conclude that the special civil part judge erred in finding that while defendant had cancelled the contract in accordance with its terms, he remained liable for his failure to make the vacuum cleaner available to plaintiff for its retrieval since his testimony that he was not aware of plaintiff’s requests to retrieve the vacuum cleaner were not credible.
