Recently the Honorable Clarkson S. Fisher Jr., P.J.A.D., in recognizing that “the jury is the bedrock of our system of justice,” refused to remit a $2.4 million jury verdict, and astutely explained why judges should be reluctant to substitute their view for the jury’s view of the evidence.
Mickens v. Misdom, ___ N.J. Super. ___ ( App. Div. 2015), was a minimum-impact case in which a 40-year-old plaintiff sustained a herniated disc at L-4-5, which resulted in disc removal surgery, caused the plaintiff to miss four weeks from work as a warehouse worker, and resulted in a permanent injury for which the plaintiff experienced daily pain.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
