Expert opinions that contradict the facts of a case cannot be admitted into evidence, a unanimous New Jersey Supreme Court ruled March 12.
March 12, 2015 at 01:25 PM
1 minute read
Expert opinions that contradict the facts of a case cannot be admitted into evidence, a unanimous New Jersey Supreme Court ruled March 12.
The decision reversed an Appellate Division ruling in Townsend v. Pierre that allowed such an opinion in through the use of a hypothetical question and with a corresponding instruction to the jury.
Presented by BigVoodoo
This event shines a spotlight on the individuals, teams, projects and organizations that are changing the financial industry.
BTI provides leading tax professionals from financial institutions with unmatched tools and resources.
Honoring outstanding legal achievements focused at the national level, largely around Big Law and in-house departments.
Our client, a small but highly sophisticated and entrepreneurial tax boutique in Charleston, SC, has asked for our firm s assistance in iden...
CORE RESPONSIBILITIES AND TASKS:(1) Tasks and responsibilities include:Reviewing and negotiating commercial agreements for internal business...
Boutique midtown Manhattan law firm specializing in sophisticated real estate litigation & representation of commercial and residential ...
