The New Jersey Supreme Court’s recent decision in Wadeer v. N.J. Mfrs. Ins. Co., (A-54-12) (Feb. 18, 2015), appears to show the court’s willingness to expand the remedies available to plaintiffs in uninsured/underinsured motorist (UM/UIM) claims. Although the actual holding of this case was not substantial, in terms of expanding the law, it was the issues not fully decided that may play an important role in future UM/UIM litigation.
Specifically, they court effectively “punted” the following issues to the Civil Practice Committee for review:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
