A year after Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher’s Randy Mastro issued his findings on the so-called Bridgegate scandal, the firm is fighting a subpoena issued in the criminal case, claiming it possesses no notes beyond the memoranda included in the report.
Defense attorneys appear skeptical, but eschewing traditional note-taking appears to be common practice.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
