Despite what it said was an erroneous jury charge on the “mode of operation” doctrine, a New Jersey appeals court has refused to disturb nearly $500,000 in damages awarded to an octogenarian and his wife after he was injured in the parking lot of his country club.
A two-judge Appellate Division panel said the erroneous jury charge was not reason enough to overturn the verdict.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
