Lawyers argued before the New Jersey Supreme Court on Jan. 6 over whether a union laborer’s complaints of wage violations and alleged retaliation for his whistleblower activity are automatically pre-empted by federal labor law.

In Puglia v. Elk Pipeline, plaintiff Salvatore Puglia, a laborer who claims he was laid off after he complained that his employer was violating the state’s Prevailing Wage Act (PWA) is asking the court to overturn two lower court rulings that because there was a collective bargaining agreement between his union and the employer, federal labor laws pre-empt any actions in state court.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]