Internet defamation is a regular occurrence. While the common law affords e-defamation victims a right to sue both the original speaker of the defamatory statements and the publisher, Internet anonymity of the original speaker and the publisher’s use of Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act of 1996 (CDA) often make such litigation difficult. However, the CDA also provides a basis for combating Internet defamation. In particular, the CDA allows plaintiffs to definitively identify actions that make Internet publishers liable.
Typical Internet site protocol, such as a terms of use agreement, generally gives rise to promissory estoppel and thereby a basis for action against both the defamer and the defamer’s publisher. Disparaging another’s reputation using the Internet is just as defamatory as slanderous speech or libelous content. E-defamation is subject to the same legal ramifications under common law as traditional defamation. A plaintiff must plead and prove the same elements of defamation in either case to prevail.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
