A New Jersey appeals court has ruled that Princeton’s Hill Wallack cannot represent a developer and landowner in two disputes over affordable housing because one of the firm’s partners represented the adverse interests of the plaintiffs in the landmark Mount Laurel litigation decades ago.
The three-judge Appellate Division panel, in an unpublished decision, said that allowing the firm, and the partner, Stephen Eisdorfer, to continue to represent the company in the two cases would violate the Rules of Professional Conduct.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
