The New Jersey Supreme Court Committee on Attorney Advertising has issued a warning that many lawyers are failing to comply with its rules governing promotion of comparative accolades like “Super Lawyers” and “Best Lawyers.”

The committee said it was prompted to issue a reminder about the rules concerning such accolades because of the numerous grievances it receives on the subject. In a May 18 notice, the committee said advertising can refer to those accolades only when the basis for comparison can be verified and the organization issuing the award has sufficiently vetted the lawyer. In addition, the committee said it sought to remind lawyers that such honors can be referenced in advertisements only with the addition of certain language to provide explanation and context.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]