Exactly what constitutes a “bill of particulars” was the issue at the center of arguments before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit on Monday over whether to disclose a list of unindicted co-conspirators from the Bridgegate scandal.
The lawyer for media companies seeking disclosure of the names argued the list is in and of itself a bill of particulars and therefore public information. But U.S. Attorney Paul Fishman and a lawyer for a party named on the list claimed it is not a bill of particulars.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
