After nearly nine years of litigation, there is no shortage of lofty arguments about the fairness of a New York state law requiring attorneys practicing in the state to maintain an office there. But Ekaterina Schoenefeld, the Princeton solo who now seeks U.S. Supreme Court review of the matter—with successes, failures and a bit of name recognition along the way—speaks about the case in a very practical manner.
“I am so many years into this litigation, it’s most logical to complete it,” Schoenefeld said in an interview. “I generally finish what I start, so why would I stop now?”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
