A $9 Mojito or an $8 Margarita. Different prices for a beer served at a restaurant’s bar instead of the same beer served at the table. When those price differences are not disclosed on a restaurant’s menu, which often don’t list drink prices at all, can those nondisclosures be the basis for class-action suits?
The New Jersey Supreme Court will soon give an answer. The court on Tuesday heard arguments over whether restaurants violate state consumer-protection laws when they fail to list mixed drink or beer prices on their menus.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
