One of the mandates of “best practices” is the compression of the time it takes to resolve a case. While an admirable goal, it has a potential downside in matrimonial matters: an increase in post-judgment cases because of heightened antagonism between parties and second-guessing of hastily crafted solutions.
Best practices can benefit, therefore, from data collection and facilitated negotiation outside of litigation, particularly before pleadings are filed.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
