Where plaintiffs were not negligent and the jury's task was to allocate fault among joint tortfeasors, the court should not have given an ultimate-outcome charge instructing the jury that plaintiffs may recover the full amount of their damages from any defendant found to be 60% or more responsible for the total damages, and that a defendant whose share of responsibility is less than 60% shall pay only that percentage of the total damages attributable to him; the ultimate-outcome charge was prejudicial er
August 04, 2003 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
Presented by BigVoodoo
New Jersey Law Journal honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in New Jersey with their dedication to the profession.
This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.
Recognizing innovation in the legal technology sector for working on precedent-setting, game-changing projects and initiatives.
Seeking motivated and skilled litigation attorney to join our dynamic defense litigation firm. Role Involves:Conducting thorough research.Ha...
DEPUTY PORT ATTORNEY III Oakland, CA Salary: $17,294 - $21,419/month, 37.5-hr work week Your Port. Your Community. Your Career. Whe...
Stern, Lavinthal & Frankenberg, LLC, is seeking a foreclosure attorney experienced in the NJ and/or NY foreclosure process and default l...