The trial judge correctly found that the hold-harmless clause in the property settlement incorporated into the parties' judgment of divorce does not require defendant to remove his wife's name from the mortgage on the marital home by refinancing or selling it and there are no exceptional circumstances warranting its modification to afford remedies they discussed and rejected; even if damage to her credit rating resulting from his default on payments were covered by the clause, she has not proved such harm.
April 19, 2004 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
Presented by BigVoodoo
Celebrating achievement, excellence, and innovation in the legal profession in the UK.
Join the industry's top owners, investors, developers, brokers and financiers for the real estate healthcare event of the year!
This event shines a spotlight on how individuals and firms are changing the investment advisory industry where it matters most.
Downtown NY property and casualty defense law firm seeks a Litigation Associate with 3+ years' experience to become a part of our team! You ...
Description: Fox Rothschild has an opening in the New York office for a Counsel in our renowned Labor & Employment Department, working w...
Our client, a large, privately-owned healthcare company, has engaged us to find an Assistant General Counsel for their headquarters located ...
