Where plaintiff alleged that defendant, chief of surgery, sabotaged plaintiff's application for privileges at the hospital and communicated false statements about him, plaintiff did not demonstrate the concerted-action element of a restraint-of-trade claim under N.J.S.A. 56:9-3 or an unlawful purpose or anticompetitive effect for a claim under 56:9-3; that the hospital may have acquiesced to defendant's unreasonable demands and chosen to let him "run the show" is not proof of an unlawful agreement.
May 24, 2004 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
Presented by BigVoodoo
New Jersey Law Journal honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in New Jersey with their dedication to the profession.
This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.
Recognizing innovation in the legal technology sector for working on precedent-setting, game-changing projects and initiatives.
DEPUTY PORT ATTORNEY III Oakland, CA Salary: $17,294 - $21,419/month, 37.5-hr work week Your Port. Your Community. Your Career. Whe...
Stern, Lavinthal & Frankenberg, LLC, is seeking a foreclosure attorney experienced in the NJ and/or NY foreclosure process and default l...
Mineola defense firm seeks attorneys with 3-5 years of actual insurance defense experience to handle complex general liability matters. Sala...