Where plaintiff alleged that defendant, chief of surgery, sabotaged plaintiff's application for privileges at the hospital and communicated false statements about him, plaintiff did not demonstrate the concerted-action element of a restraint-of-trade claim under N.J.S.A. 56:9-3 or an unlawful purpose or anticompetitive effect for a claim under 56:9-3; that the hospital may have acquiesced to defendant's unreasonable demands and chosen to let him "run the show" is not proof of an unlawful agreement.
May 24, 2004 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
Presented by BigVoodoo
Join the industry's top owners, investors, developers, brokers and financiers for the real estate healthcare event of the year!
This event shines a spotlight on how individuals and firms are changing the investment advisory industry where it matters most.
This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.
We are seeking two attorneys with a minimum of two to three years of experience to join our prominent and thriving education law practice in...
Description: Fox Rothschild has an opening in the New York office for a Real Estate Litigation Associate with three to six years of commerci...
Downtown NY property and casualty defense law firm seeks a Litigation Associate with 3+ years' experience to become a part of our team! You ...
