While defendant's name is embossed on these stolen money orders next to "Issuer/Drawer," the remainder of the documents clearly indicates that the purchaser's signature is required to authenticate the writing, and since the signatures here were not made by "purchasers," there are no authorized signatures, and the dismissal of this action by plaintiff-assignee of the check-cashing entities that cashed the money orders is affirmed -- plaintiff may get relief only from those who actually signed the orders.
July 05, 2004 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
Presented by BigVoodoo
This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.
Recognizing innovation in the legal technology sector for working on precedent-setting, game-changing projects and initiatives.
Legalweek New York explores Business and Regulatory Trends, Technology and Talent drivers impacting law firms.
The Partners Group is currently recruiting a VP of Legal for our burgeoning client, a real estate investment firm in Atlanta, GA. The firm h...
The United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit seeks applications for a bankruptcy judgeship in the District of Utah. Bankruptcy ...
Harter Secrest and Emery is seeking a securities and capital markets attorney, senior associate or counsel level, with eight or more years o...
