Appellant's initial commitment to the Special Treatment Unit under the Sexually Violent Predator Act, based on expert medical testimony that relied heavily on hearsay in the form of the opinions and findings of other experts who did not testify and who had not treated him but merely rendered forensic evaluations at the prosecutor's request and whom he did not have the opportunity to cross-examine, was error that was clearly capable of producing an unjust result and a new commitment hearing is required.
August 23, 2004 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
Presented by BigVoodoo
New Jersey Law Journal honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in New Jersey with their dedication to the profession.
This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.
Recognizing innovation in the legal technology sector for working on precedent-setting, game-changing projects and initiatives.
Search for the President and Dean California Western School of Law San Diego, California California Western School of Law (California ...
Duane Morris LLP has an opening for an associate with 2-3 years of experience with strong capital markets and corporate transactional backgr...
Our client, an established provider of professional liability insurance, has engaged us to identify a highly-qualified Senior Bad Faith Tria...
