By repeatedly stating its belief that defendant's capital sentence would never be carried out, the post-conviction relief court demonstrated a diminished sense of responsibility, and its findings and conclusions are null and void; based on a de novo review of the PCR court's factual findings, its denial for relief is affirmed; additionally, it would violate due process to deprive a capital defendant of the opportunity to present expert testimony to support a bona fide claim of mental retardation.
October 25, 2004 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
Presented by BigVoodoo
New Jersey Law Journal honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in New Jersey with their dedication to the profession.
This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.
Recognizing innovation in the legal technology sector for working on precedent-setting, game-changing projects and initiatives.
THE CITY OF FORT LAUDERDALE, FL INVITES YOUR INTEREST FOR THE POSITION OF CITY ATTORNEYWelcome to the City of Fort Lauderdale. Click on the ...
McCarter & English, LLP seeks an associate for an in-person position in McCarter s Washington DC office. McCarter s energy transactiona...
TIRED OF LAW? MOTIVATED REAL ESTATE AGENTS FOR F/T POSITION WITH TOP RESIDENTIAL REAL ESTATE TEAM AT BROWN HARRIS STEVENS RESIDENTIAL SALE...
