Despite the failure to provide a detailed identification instruction, there was no reversible error since the court instructed that the State had the burden of proving beyond a reasonable doubt each element of the offenses; although the court improperly admitted certain hearsay statements as excited utterances, the error was harmless; the court did not err in excluding defendant's proffered evidence of third-party guilt; allowing testimony regarding certain out-of-court statements was harmless error here.
February 07, 2005 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
Presented by BigVoodoo
New Jersey Law Journal honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in New Jersey with their dedication to the profession.
This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.
Recognizing innovation in the legal technology sector for working on precedent-setting, game-changing projects and initiatives.
DEPUTY PORT ATTORNEY III Oakland, CA Salary: $17,294 - $21,419/month, 37.5-hr work week Your Port. Your Community. Your Career. Whe...
Stern, Lavinthal & Frankenberg, LLC, is seeking a foreclosure attorney experienced in the NJ and/or NY foreclosure process and default l...
Mineola defense firm seeks attorneys with 3-5 years of actual insurance defense experience to handle complex general liability matters. Sala...
