While both of the State's expert witnesses took into account prior forensic evaluations of appellant conducted in connection with his criminal convictions, they based their opinions on their own evaluations of him and did not simply agree with the opinions of other, nontestifying examiners, and appellant's commitment under the Sexually Violent Predator Act is affirmed; also, while presentence investigation reports should not be accepted uncritically, there was no improper use of PSI information here.
May 23, 2005 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
Presented by BigVoodoo
New Jersey Law Journal honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in New Jersey with their dedication to the profession.
This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.
Recognizing innovation in the legal technology sector for working on precedent-setting, game-changing projects and initiatives.
McCarter & English, LLP, a well established and growing law firm, is actively seeking a talented and driven associate having 2-5 years o...
Gill & Chamas, LLC seeks a Personal Injury attorney to work in their Woodbridge, NJ office. Candidate must possess the following: ...
We are seeking an attorney with a minimum of four years of experience in transactional work to join our well-established, nationally renowne...
