While both of the State's expert witnesses took into account prior forensic evaluations of appellant conducted in connection with his criminal convictions, they based their opinions on their own evaluations of him and did not simply agree with the opinions of other, nontestifying examiners, and appellant's commitment under the Sexually Violent Predator Act is affirmed; also, while presentence investigation reports should not be accepted uncritically, there was no improper use of PSI information here.
May 23, 2005 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
Presented by BigVoodoo
Celebrating achievement, excellence, and innovation in the legal profession in the UK.
Join the industry's top owners, investors, developers, brokers and financiers for the real estate healthcare event of the year!
This event shines a spotlight on how individuals and firms are changing the investment advisory industry where it matters most.
Description: Fox Rothschild has an opening in the New York office for a Real Estate Litigation Associate with three to six years of commerci...
Downtown NY property and casualty defense law firm seeks a Litigation Associate with 3+ years' experience to become a part of our team! You ...
Description: Fox Rothschild has an opening in the New York office for a Counsel in our renowned Labor & Employment Department, working w...
