Defendant-homeowners' motives for filing several actions objecting to the planning board's approval of the development are irrelevant to their right to seek redress and, since their complaints (which were dismissed on summary judgment) cannot be found to be meritless, the developer's suit for malicious abuse of process, malicious use of process and tortious interference with prospective economic advantage was properly dismissed by the trial court.
May 23, 2005 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
Presented by BigVoodoo
Join the industry's top owners, investors, developers, brokers and financiers for the real estate healthcare event of the year!
This event shines a spotlight on how individuals and firms are changing the investment advisory industry where it matters most.
This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.
We are seeking two attorneys with a minimum of two to three years of experience to join our prominent and thriving education law practice in...
Description: Fox Rothschild has an opening in the New York office for a Real Estate Litigation Associate with three to six years of commerci...
