The part of defendants' proposed amended pleadings regarding plaintiff's nondisclosure of the prior judicial ruling on an earlier patent fails to state a claim for patent misuse or unclean hands because the earlier patent concerns a product different from that addressed by the present patent; moreover, plaintiff's alleged misconduct did not broaden the patent's physical or temporal scope; the allegations of patent misuse and unclean hands are therefore futile and the motions for leave to amend are denied.
August 22, 2005 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
Presented by BigVoodoo
New Jersey Law Journal honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in New Jersey with their dedication to the profession.
This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.
Recognizing innovation in the legal technology sector for working on precedent-setting, game-changing projects and initiatives.
U.S. BANKRUPTCY JUDGESHIP VACANCY District of New Jersey Chief Judge Michael A. Chagares of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third...
McCarter & English, LLP, a well established and growing law firm, is actively seeking a talented and driven associate having 2-5 years o...
Company DescriptionA prominent boutique AV rated Education Law firm located in Westbury, New York. Our firm specializes in education law, sp...