Where plaintiff seeks a declaratory judgment that its subsidiaries cannot be held liable for the asbestos-related claims against it under any theory of successor liability or "alter ego" (piercing the corporate veil), its motion to strike defendants' jury demand is denied as to both issues since had defendants initiated an action for recovery on their claims, they would have been seeking monetary damages which is a legal remedy entitling them to a jury trial, as is piercing the corporate veil.
August 22, 2005 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
Presented by BigVoodoo
New Jersey Law Journal honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in New Jersey with their dedication to the profession.
This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.
Recognizing innovation in the legal technology sector for working on precedent-setting, game-changing projects and initiatives.
U.S. BANKRUPTCY JUDGESHIP VACANCY District of New Jersey Chief Judge Michael A. Chagares of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third...
McCarter & English, LLP, a well established and growing law firm, is actively seeking a talented and driven associate having 2-5 years o...
Company DescriptionA prominent boutique AV rated Education Law firm located in Westbury, New York. Our firm specializes in education law, sp...