The District Court erred in ruling that former employees who were participants in a defined contribution plan may not prosecute a derivative action on behalf of an employees' savings plan to recover losses sustained by the plan because of alleged breaches of fiduciary duty; plaintiffs may seek money damages on behalf of the fund, notwithstanding the fact that the alleged fiduciary violations affected only a subset of the saving plan's participants.
September 12, 2005 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
Presented by BigVoodoo
New Jersey Law Journal honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in New Jersey with their dedication to the profession.
This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.
Recognizing innovation in the legal technology sector for working on precedent-setting, game-changing projects and initiatives.
DEPUTY PORT ATTORNEY III Oakland, CA Salary: $17,294 - $21,419/month, 37.5-hr work week Your Port. Your Community. Your Career. Whe...
Stern, Lavinthal & Frankenberg, LLC, is seeking a foreclosure attorney experienced in the NJ and/or NY foreclosure process and default l...
Mineola defense firm seeks attorneys with 3-5 years of actual insurance defense experience to handle complex general liability matters. Sala...