The statute that disenfranchises those on parole or probation for an indictable offense is specifically authorized by the State Constitution and is not violative of it; further, where a statute is facially neutral, and there is no allegation of invidious purpose (plaintiffs argue only that the statute inadvertently has a disparate impact on African-Americans and Hispanics), disparate impact is an insufficient basis for relief under the State's equal protection doctrine.
November 07, 2005 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
Presented by BigVoodoo
New Jersey Law Journal honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in New Jersey with their dedication to the profession.
This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.
Recognizing innovation in the legal technology sector for working on precedent-setting, game-changing projects and initiatives.
Zeisler & Zeisler, P.C., a highly-regarded corporate restructuring, bankruptcy and commercial litigation boutique, seeks an attorney to ...
General Counsel Posting Number: 1925 Closing Date: Location: Oakland, CA (Hybrid) The Public Health Institute (PHI) is an in...
We are seeking an associate to join our Bankruptcy & Creditors Rights practice in either Hartford or Stamford. Candidates should have a...