The statute that disenfranchises those on parole or probation for an indictable offense is specifically authorized by the State Constitution and is not violative of it; further, where a statute is facially neutral, and there is no allegation of invidious purpose (plaintiffs argue only that the statute inadvertently has a disparate impact on African-Americans and Hispanics), disparate impact is an insufficient basis for relief under the State's equal protection doctrine.
November 07, 2005 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
Presented by BigVoodoo
This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.
Recognizing innovation in the legal technology sector for working on precedent-setting, game-changing projects and initiatives.
Legalweek New York explores Business and Regulatory Trends, Technology and Talent drivers impacting law firms.
McCarter & English is actively seeking a 5th-6th year trademark associate who has trademark prosecution, licensing and litigation experi...
**PLEASE READ THE COMPLETE AD BEFORE APPLYING***Established 25-year boutique Plaintiff's Personal Injury Law Firm in the Dadeland area seeki...
Our client, a multi-state full-service boutique, is seeking to add a senior construction litigation associate to their Florida team. Qualif...
