Defendant challenged his conviction for animal cruelty and the conditions imposed on his parole supervision for life following a jury trial.

Court properly invalidated zoning amendment where township failed to provide copies of the amendment text in two locations as it did not supply the text for the public notice nor forwarded a copy to the county law library. Order of the trial court affirmed.

Additional defendants filed preliminary objections to defendants' joinder complaint in plaintiff's professional liability action asserting improper and negligent pre- and post-natal treatment to herself and child and court found permitting joinder here, where the statutes of limitations on the claims will not expire until several years in the future and, in fact, had not yet begun to run, seemed to be the most sensible approach and the joinder complaint was sufficiently clear to enable additional defendant doctor to prepare his defens

Apple unable to appeal discovery order due to lack of clarity on scope and type of discovery Apple is required to produce

In this § 1925(a) opinion, the court urged the Superior Court to affirm it's order sustaining defendant's preliminary objections to plaintiff's complaint seeking money damages for water damage allegedly caused by defendant landlord or its agents at plaintiff's rental property and to remand the case to the trial court.

"Proof evidence or presumption great" standard of proof only applied to the dangerousness exception to the constitutional right to bail, not to the capital punishment or life imprisonment exceptions. Order of the trial court vacated, case remanded.

City engaged in a de facto taking where it delayed remediation of landslide that ultimately caused structural damage to homeowners' properties as the city attempted to strongarm owners into waiving their rights against the city. Order of the trial court affirmed.

The court affirmed the order of the Luzerne County Court of Common Pleas that concluded that it lacked subject matter jurisdiction over appellant's petition for review of the determination of his retirement benefits when the police union's collective bargaining agreement with the City was the exclusive method of challenging his retirement benefit. It found appellant had standing to grieve his pension benefits under the CBA, and erroneously petitioned the trial court for an appeal rather than engage in the CBA's grievance and arbitrat

In this § 1925(a) opinion, the court justified its decision granting judgment to appellants for the investment funds and to appellee for title to decedent's residence in a dispute between surviving siblings.

Defendant appealed the denial of his motion to correct an illegal sentence.