Filter This View

  • Phillips v. York

    Publication Date: 2017-11-06
    Practice Area: Family Law
    Industry:
    Court: Appellate Division
    Judge: Per Curiam
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: A-1149-16T1

    Although never married the parties bore one child together and entered into a formal custody agreement providing for joint physical and legal custody.

  • Marra v. Berlant

    Publication Date: 2017-11-06
    Practice Area: Contractual Disputes | Corporate Governance
    Industry:
    Court: Appellate Division
    Judge: Per Curiam
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: A-0149-15T3

    In their fifteen-count complaint, respondents alleged, among other things, breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty, unjust enrichment, and conversion; appellants pled several affirmative defenses, including laches and statute of limitations.

  • Ackerman v. Gen. Motors, LLC

    Publication Date: 2017-11-06
    Practice Area: Civil Procedure | Motor Vehicle Torts
    Industry: Automotive
    Court: Appellate Division
    Judge: Per Curiam
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: A-4629-15T2

    Defendant appealed the order granting plaintiff's cross-motion to dismiss its complaint with prejudice pursuant to Rule 4:37-1(b), the order denying defendant's motion for summary judgment as moot, and the order denying defendant's motion for attorneys' fees.

  • Div. of Child Protection and Permanency v. M.C.

    Publication Date: 2017-11-06
    Practice Area: Family Law
    Industry:
    Court: Appellate Division
    Judge: Per Curiam
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: A-5609-15T1

    Defendant appealed the order terminating his parental rights to his daughter.

  • Pollack v. Quick Quality Rest., Inc.

    Publication Date: 2017-11-06
    Practice Area: Contractual Disputes
    Industry: Food and Beverage | Real Estate
    Court: Appellate Division
    Judge: Judge Whipple
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Michael J. Epstein (Epstein Law Firm, PA, attorneys; Mr. Epstein, of counsel and on the briefs; Michael A. Rabasca, on the briefs)
    for defendant: John R. Wenzke (Lasser Hochman, LLC, attorneys; Mr. Wenzke, of counsel and on the brief)
    Case Number: A-1967-15T2

    Right of First Refusal Did Not Trigger Brokers Commission Where Terms Not Included in Bona Fide Purchase Agreement

  • State v. Tanashian

    Publication Date: 2017-11-03
    Practice Area: Criminal Law
    Industry:
    Court: Appellate Division
    Judge: Per Curiam
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: A-0623-15T4

    In one day, appellant was involved in three separate motor vehicle accidents, two of which resulted in the issuance of tickets, including for driving while impaired and leaving the scene of an accident.

  • L. S. v. Fellus

    Publication Date: 2017-11-03
    Practice Area: Personal Injury
    Industry:
    Court: Appellate Division
    Judge: Judge Ostrer
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: A-5520-14T3

    Doctor appealed the verdict awarding compensatory and punitive damages to plaintiff for mental health injuries he caused by engaging in a sexual relationship with her while treating her for a brain injury.

  • R.M. v. L.A.G.

    Publication Date: 2017-11-03
    Practice Area: Family Law
    Industry:
    Court: Appellate Division
    Judge: Per Curiam
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: A-4969-15T2

    Plaintiff appealed the trial court's denial of his request for a final restraining order, after he and defendant filed cross-complaints for FROs.

  • N.J. Div. of Child Prot. and Permanency v. C.L.

    Publication Date: 2017-11-03
    Practice Area: Family Law
    Industry:
    Court: Appellate Division
    Judge: Per Curiam
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: A-1596-16T1

    Defendant appealed from the termination of her parental rights to three of her four biological children, arguing that plaintiff had failed to prove the four statutory prongs for termination of parental rights by clear and convincing evidence.

  • E.H. v. Div. of Med. Assistance and Health Servs.

    Publication Date: 2017-11-03
    Practice Area: Health Care Law
    Industry:
    Court: Appellate Division
    Judge: Per Curiam
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: A-4560-15T2

    Petitioner, by her designated authorized representative Future Care Consultants, appealed from respondent's failure to respond to petitioner's request to transfer this matter to the Office of Administrative Law for a hearing.