Pro se plaintiff moved to disqualify defendants' counsel in her employment action.

Appellants, a student and her parent, appealed the district court's judgment on the administrative record in favor of appellee school district in their action seeking compensatory education under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act. The court vacated and remanded where the district court erroneously concluded it need not separately analyze a Child Find claim under Section 504 after conducting a similar analysis under the IDEA.

In a § 1925(a) opinion, the court urged the Commonwealth Court to affirm its order sustaining the City and Mayor's preliminary objections and dismissing plaintiffs' complaint with prejudice since the issue had previously been litigated in federal court and resolved.

Plaintiff filed a pro se action in the Southern District of New York, alleging employment discrimination and retaliation under Title VII, as well as claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act and state law.

New York v. Sara E. Reed

Plaintiff moved for attorney fees in its breach of franchise agreement action.

District court erred in resolving Americans with Disabilities Act and Section 504 claims arising from same facts as Individuals with Disabilities Education Act claim through the administrative record. Order of the district court reversed and remanded in part.

Department of Human Services' calculation of rate reimbursement by inflating costs from the end point of the cost report year to the mid-point of the rate year was a reasonable interpretation of ambiguous regulations and was thus entitled to administrative agency deference. Order of DHS, Bureau of Hearings and Appeals affirmed.

Plaintiffs Altisource S.A.R.L.

New York v. James D. Farmer Jr.