Filter This View

  • Braemar at W. Milford, LLC v. W. Milford Twp.

    Publication Date: 2020-01-14
    Practice Area: Real Estate | Tax
    Industry:
    Court: Tax Court
    Judge: Judge Novin
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 012238-2010

    Defendant moved for reconsideration of the court's opinion finding that the highest and best use of plaintiff's property was as three single-family home lots as of the subject valuation dates.

  • 9 Plaza Court, LLC v. City of Long Branch

    Publication Date: 2020-01-14
    Practice Area: Real Estate | Tax
    Industry:
    Court: Tax Court
    Judge: Judge Sundar
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 013592-2016

    Plaintiff filed suit to challenge the local property tax assessments for its single-family residence.

  • Hill v. Twp. of Moorestown

    Publication Date: 2020-01-10
    Practice Area: Tax
    Industry:
    Court: Tax Court
    Judge: Judge DeAlmeida
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 009783-2008

    Plaintiffs moved to seal portions of the record in the present case's appellate division proceedings.

  • Plaza Twenty Three Station, LLC v. Twp. of Pequannock

    Publication Date: 2020-01-10
    Practice Area: Tax
    Industry:
    Court: Tax Court
    Judge: Judge Bianco
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 002870-2018

    Plaintiff challenged the 2018 and 2019 local property tax assessments of its commercial property.

  • Wolosky v. Fredon Twp.

    Publication Date: 2019-12-30
    Practice Area: Tax
    Industry: Real Estate | State and Local Government
    Court: Tax Court
    Judge: Judge Bianco
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Walter M. Luers (Walter M. Luers, LLC, attorneys)
    for defendant: Tara Ann St. Angelo (Gebhardt & Kiefer, P.C., attorneys); William E. Hinkes (Hollander, Strelzik, Pasculli, Hinkes, Wojcik, Gacquin, Vandenberg & Hontz, L.L.C., attorneys)
    Case Number: 008267-2016; 009548-2017; 010326-2018

    Prevailing Defendants Entitled to Frivolous Litigation Sanctions Where Evidence Demonstrated Tax Appeal Was Act of Premeditated Revenge

  • Law Journal Press | Digital Book

    Pennsylvania Orphans’ Court Rules 2024

    Authors:

    View this Book

    View more book results for the query "*"

  • Tartivita v. Borough of Union Beach

    Publication Date: 2019-12-23
    Practice Area: Tax
    Industry: Real Estate | State and Local Government
    Court: Tax Court
    Judge: Judge Sundar
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Valentina Tartivita, pro se plaintiff
    for defendant: John T. Lane, Jr. (John T. Lane, Jr., Esq., attorney)
    Case Number: 007705-2018

    Market-Sales Based Annual Assessment Did Not Constitute Complete or District-Wide Reassessment That Would Preclude Freeze Act Relief

  • Wolosky v. Fredon Twp.

    Publication Date: 2019-12-19
    Practice Area: Tax
    Industry:
    Court: Tax Court
    Judge: Judge Bianco
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 008267-2016

    Defendants moved for frivolous suit sanctions against plaintiff.

  • Tartivita v. Borough of Union Beach

    Publication Date: 2019-12-10
    Practice Area: Real Estate | Tax
    Industry:
    Court: Tax Court
    Judge: Judge Sundar
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 007705-2018

    Plaintiff appealed the assessment on her home, arguing that she was entitled to Freeze Act relief.

  • Balmer v. Twp. of Holmdel

    Publication Date: 2019-12-10
    Practice Area: Real Estate | Tax
    Industry:
    Court: Tax Court
    Judge: Judge Murray
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 014488-2015

    The parties cross-moved for summary judgment in plaintiff's complaint, in which plaintiff sought to vacate the county board's imposition of rollback taxes for tax years 2012 and 2013.

  • Rosenblum v. Borough of Closter

    Publication Date: 2019-12-09
    Practice Area: Tax
    Industry:
    Court: Tax Court
    Judge: Judge Andresini
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 013052-2019

    Third-party plaintiff moved for reconsideration of the court's ruling that his failure to appear for his hearing on the present matter required dismissal of his tax appeal for lack of jurisdiction.