• Glenpointe Assocs. IV, LLC v. Twp. of Teaneck

    Publication Date: 2019-07-11
    Practice Area: Tax
    Industry:
    Court: Tax Court
    Judge: Judge Andresini
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 013983-2018

    The parties cross-moved for summary judgment on plaintiff's challenge to the calculation of non-residential development fees for plaintiff's development of a hotel, pursuant to the Statewide Non-Residential Development Fee Act.

  • Stanislaus Food Prods. Co. v. Dir., Div. of Taxation

    Publication Date: 2019-07-01
    Practice Area: Tax
    Industry:
    Court: Tax Court
    Judge: Judge Cimino
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 011050-2017

    Plaintiff filed a complaint challenging the director's imposition of the alternative minimum assessment, which imposed a gross receipts or profits tax exclusively upon entities that qualified under P.L. 86-272, a federal statute that precluded states from imposing net income tax upon certain out-of-state sellers of tangible goods.

  • Darcey v. Dir., Div. of Taxation

    Publication Date: 2019-06-24
    Practice Area: Tax
    Industry:
    Court: Tax Court
    Judge: Judge Fiamingo
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 001480-2018

    Defendant moved for summary judgment dismissal of plaintiff's complaint.

  • Sandberg Enter., Inc. v. Fanwood Borough

    Publication Date: 2019-06-18
    Practice Area: Tax
    Industry:
    Court: Tax Court
    Judge: Judge Novin
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 013488-2014

    Plaintiff filed a local property tax appeal challenging the 2014 through 2016 local property tax assessments on plaintiff's property.

  • 160 Chubb Props., LLC v. Twp. of Lyndhurst

    Publication Date: 2019-06-17
    Practice Area: Tax
    Industry: Real Estate
    Court: Tax Court
    Judge: Judge Orsen
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Joseph G. Ragno and Robert J. Guanci (Waters, McPherson, McNeill, P.C., attorneys)
    for defendant: Kenneth A. Porro (Chasan Lamparello Mallon & Cappuzzo, P.C., attorneys)

    Case Number: 002442-2014; 006305-2015

    Subsequent Owner Entitled to Freeze Act Relief Where Taxing Authority Failed to Make Prima Facie Showing of Substantial or Material Change to Value

  • Law Journal Press | Digital Book

    California Premises Liability Law

    Authors: Jayme C. Long

    View this Book

    View more book results for the query "*"

  • Charley O's, Inc. v. Dir., Div. of Taxation

    Publication Date: 2019-06-14
    Practice Area: Tax
    Industry:
    Court: Tax Court
    Judge: Judge Cimino
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 002178-2016

    Plaintiff filed a complaint appealing the additional tax, interest, and penalties assessed by defendant, after defendant used the indirect mark-on method to determine the assessment amount.

  • VNO 1105 State Hwy. 36 LLC v. Twp. of Hazlet

    Publication Date: 2019-06-11
    Practice Area: Tax
    Industry:
    Court: Tax Court
    Judge: Judge Sundar
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 004038-2013

    Plaintiff moved for reconsideration of the court's order to bar plaintiff's expert, an assessor from another municipality, from testifying at trial.

  • United Dev. of Am. LLC v. Paterson City

    Publication Date: 2019-06-05
    Practice Area: Tax
    Industry:
    Court: Tax Court
    Judge: Judge Novin
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 001142-2014

    Plaintiff filed a challenge to the 2014 and 2016 local property tax assessment upon its property issued by defendant.

  • 160 Chubb Props, LLC v. Twp. of Lyndhurst

    Publication Date: 2019-06-03
    Practice Area: Tax
    Industry:
    Court: Tax Court
    Judge: Judge Orsen
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 002442-2014

    Defendant moved for reconsideration of the court's decision granting relief to plaintiff for tax year 2017 pursuant to the Freeze Act.

  • ML Plainsboro L.P. v. Twp. of Plainsboro

    Publication Date: 2019-05-29
    Practice Area: Real Estate | Tax
    Industry:
    Court: Tax Court
    Judge: Judge DeAlmeida
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 002348-2005

    Plaintiff filed a complaint challenging the local property tax assessment on two parcels for tax years 2005 and 2006. On the relevant valuation dates, the property was owner-occupied, containing a complex that included first-class office space, an executive suite, a hotel conference and training center, and other amenities.