Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
43 results for '* judge:"Judge Cimino"' You can use Search Constraints to get even better search results
Publication Date: 2024-06-28
Practice Area: Tax
Industry:
Court: Tax Court
Judge: Judge Cimino
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 006926-2022
Parties cross-moved for summary judgment in action over state nicotine tax.
Publication Date: 2024-05-31
Practice Area: Tax
Industry:
Court: Tax Court
Judge: Judge Cimino
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 007517-2023
The parties cross-moved for summary judgment.
Publication Date: 2024-05-06
Practice Area: Tax
Industry:
Court: Tax Court
Judge: Judge Cimino
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 010231-2021
Pella, LLC, the plaintiff, owned a block in Cape May, New Jersey, and obtained approval for a major subdivision, which included constructing a street and multiple parcels.
Publication Date: 2024-03-28
Practice Area: Tax
Industry:
Court: Tax Court
Judge: Judge Cimino
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 011412-2021
Plaintiff moved to bar defendant's assessor from offering testimony contrary to the assessments she initially certified to the county board.
Publication Date: 2024-03-25
Practice Area: Tax
Industry: Food and Beverage | Real Estate | Retail
Court: Tax Court
Judge: Judge Cimino
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Pablo M. Kim (Heinze Law, PA)
for defendant: Paul J. Baldini (Paul J. Baldini, PA)
Case Number: 006381-2023
Municipal Charges That Could Bar Tax Appeal Included Fees Recoverable Through a Tax Sale Lien
Law Journal Press | Digital Book
Authors:
View this BookView more book results for the query "*"
Publication Date: 2024-03-06
Practice Area: Tax
Industry:
Court: Tax Court
Judge: Judge Cimino
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 006381-2023
Defendant moved to dismiss plaintiff's tax appeal due to unpaid municipal charges.
Publication Date: 2024-01-22
Practice Area: Tax
Industry:
Court: Tax Court
Judge: Judge Cimino
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 000923-2023
Defendant moved to limit plaintiff's appeal due to plaintiff's failure to comply with defendant's Chapter 91 request.
Publication Date: 2024-01-08
Practice Area: Tax
Industry:
Court: Tax Court
Judge: Judge Cimino
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Doreen A. Scott, plaintiff pro se
for defendant: Michelline Capistrano Foster, Deputy Attorney General (Matthew S. Platkin, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney) Plaintiff filed a lawsuit to challenge the director’s decision to deny plaintiff the New Jersey earned income tax credit by obligating her to file a separate state income tax return under married status. Plaintiff had filed a state income tax return with a status of head of household, while her husband filed a separate return listing his status as single. However, plaintiff and her husband could only file income tax returns under a married status, either with separate returns or a joint return. The director accordingly selected a married-separate return for plaintiff, which resulted in plaintiff being denied an EITC.
Case Number: 010435-2022
Married Couple Were Not Statutorily Required to File a Joint Federal Income Tax Return to File a Joint State Return to Qualify for EITC
Publication Date: 2024-01-08
Practice Area: Tax
Industry:
Court: Tax Court
Judge: Judge Cimino
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Doreen A. Scott, plaintiff pro se
for defendant: Michelline Capistrano Foster, Deputy Attorney General (Matthew S. Platkin, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney) Plaintiff filed a lawsuit to challenge the director’s decision to deny plaintiff the New Jersey earned income tax credit by obligating her to file a separate state income tax return under married status. Plaintiff had filed a state income tax return with a status of head of household, while her husband filed a separate return listing his status as single. However, plaintiff and her husband could only file income tax returns under a married status, either with separate returns or a joint return. The director accordingly selected a married-separate return for plaintiff, which resulted in plaintiff being denied an EITC.
Case Number: 010435-2022
Married Couple Were Not Statutorily Required to File a Joint Federal Income Tax Return to File a Joint State Return to Qualify for EITC
Publication Date: 2023-12-27
Practice Area: Tax
Industry:
Court: Tax Court
Judge: Judge Cimino
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 010435-2022
Plaintiff filed suit challenging the director's determination denying plaintiff from receiving the New Jersey earned income tax credit.
Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.
1 minute read