Filter This View

  • Senior Citizens United Cmty. Servs., Inc. v. Dir., Div. of Taxation

    Publication Date: 2021-07-06
    Practice Area: Tax
    Industry:
    Court: Tax Court
    Judge: Judge Cimino
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 005999-20201

    Plaintiff, a non-profit, filed suit for a refund of gas taxes on fuel it purchased to provide its special and rural transportation services.

  • Atl. City Mun. Util. Auth. v. City of Absecon

    Publication Date: 2021-05-11
    Practice Area: Real Estate | Tax
    Industry:
    Court: Tax Court
    Judge: Judge Cimino
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 000441-2021

    Defendants moved to dismiss plaintiff's complaint seeking a property tax exemption.

  • DePace v. Dir., Div. of Taxation

    Publication Date: 2021-03-22
    Practice Area: Tax
    Industry:
    Court: Tax Court
    Judge: Judge Cimino
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Jack A. Myerson and Matthew L. Miller (Myerson & O’Neill, attorneys)
    for defendant: Ramanjit K. Chawla (Gurbir S. Grewal, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney)
    Case Number: 013396-2019

    Income from Federal False Claims Act Award Used to Pay Legal Fees Taxable for Gross Income Tax Purposes

  • DePace v. Dir., Div. of Taxation

    Publication Date: 2021-03-11
    Practice Area: Tax
    Industry:
    Court: Tax Court
    Judge: Judge Cimino
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 013396-2019

    The parties cross-moved for summary judgment on plaintiff's complaint challenging the director's imposition of gross income tax on the attorney fee portion of a False Claims Act award plaintiff had obtained.

  • DePace v. Dir., Div. of Taxation

    Publication Date: 2020-12-23
    Practice Area: Tax
    Industry:
    Court: Tax Court
    Judge: Judge Cimino
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 013396-2019

    Plaintiff filed suit challenging the assessment of New Jersey gross income tax on the portion of his award payable to his attorney.

  • Law Journal Press | Digital Book

    Chester County Court Rules 2024

    Authors:

    View this Book

    View more book results for the query "*"

  • Urmajesty Banktruckfit Solutions, Inc. v. City of Atl. City

    Publication Date: 2020-09-16
    Practice Area: Real Estate | Tax
    Industry:
    Court: Tax Court
    Judge: Judge Cimino
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 011899-2019

    Plaintiff sought summary judgment in its complaint seeking to exempt the subject property from local property tax.

  • Cargill Meat Sols. Corp. v. Dir., Div. of Taxation

    Publication Date: 2020-03-16
    Practice Area: Tax
    Industry:
    Court: Tax Court
    Judge: Judge Cimino
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 008146-2018

    Plaintiff filed suit to challenge the litter tax on the basis that annual disbursements of litter tax revenues were not properly appropriated by the state legislature.

  • Sherman v. Ventnor City

    Publication Date: 2019-11-22
    Practice Area: Real Estate | Tax
    Industry:
    Court: Tax Court
    Judge: Judge Cimino
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 012930-2017

    Plaintiff appealed the assessment of his property.

  • Stanislaus Food Prods. Co. v. Dir., Div. of Taxation

    Publication Date: 2019-07-01
    Practice Area: Tax
    Industry:
    Court: Tax Court
    Judge: Judge Cimino
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 011050-2017

    Plaintiff filed a complaint challenging the director's imposition of the alternative minimum assessment, which imposed a gross receipts or profits tax exclusively upon entities that qualified under P.L. 86-272, a federal statute that precluded states from imposing net income tax upon certain out-of-state sellers of tangible goods.

  • Charley O's, Inc. v. Dir., Div. of Taxation

    Publication Date: 2019-06-14
    Practice Area: Tax
    Industry:
    Court: Tax Court
    Judge: Judge Cimino
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 002178-2016

    Plaintiff filed a complaint appealing the additional tax, interest, and penalties assessed by defendant, after defendant used the indirect mark-on method to determine the assessment amount.