Filter This View

  • State v. Arteaga

    Publication Date: 2023-06-26
    Practice Area: Criminal Law
    Industry:
    Court: Appellate Division
    Judge: Judge Mawla
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Tamar Y. Lerer, Assistant Deputy Public Defender (Joseph E. Krakora, Public Defender, attorney; Tamar Y. Lerer and Elizabeth C. Jarit, Deputy Public Defender, of counsel and on the briefs)
    for defendant: Patrick Galdieri, Assistant Prosecutor (Esther Suarez, Hudson County Prosecutor, attorney; Kevin Robert Sipe, Assistant Prosecutor, on the brief)
    Case Number: A-3078-21

    State Obligated to Produce Discovery Regarding Facial Recognition Technology Used to Identify Defendant to Permit Reliability Challenge

  • State v. Arteaga

    Publication Date: 2023-06-07
    Practice Area: Criminal Law | Evidence
    Industry:
    Court: Appellate Division
    Judge: Judge Mawla
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: A-3078-21

    Defendant appealed the denial of his motion to compel the state to provide discovery related to the facial recognition technology used to develop a picture of him that was then used to identify and charge him with armed robbery.

  • Jignyasa Desai, D.O., LLC v. New Jersey Mfr's Ins. Co.

    Publication Date: 2022-10-31
    Practice Area: Insurance Law
    Industry: Health Care | Insurance
    Court: Appellate Division
    Judge: Judge Mawla
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: S. Gregory Moscaritolo
    for defendant: Gregory E. Peterson (Dyer & Peterson, PC, attorneys; Gregory E. Peterson, on the brief)
    Case Number: A-0221-21

    Regulations Required Health Insurers to Reimburse According to Fee Schedule and Use "Similar Services" if CPT Code Deleted from Current CPT Book

  • Desai, D.O., LLC v. New Jersey Mfr's Ins. Co.

    Publication Date: 2022-10-20
    Practice Area: Dispute Resolution | Insurance Law
    Industry:
    Court: Appellate Division
    Judge: Judge Mawla
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: A-0221-21

    Plaintiff appealed the denial of its request to modify an arbitration award between the parties regarding reimbursement for nerve tests performed on plaintiff's patient.

  • L.R. v. Cherry Hill Bd. of Educ.

    Publication Date: 2022-10-11
    Practice Area: Public Records
    Industry: Education
    Court: Appellate Division
    Judge: Judge Mawla
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Jamie Epstein and Cohn Lifland Pearlman Herrmann & Knopf, LLP (Jamie Epstein and Walter M. Luers, on the brief)
    for defendant: Methfessel & Werbel (Eric Harrison, of counsel; Raina Marie Pitts, on the brief)
    Case Number: A-1819-20

    Student Initials Constituted Personally Identifying Information That Qualified Document as a Student Record

  • Law Journal Press | Digital Book

    Florida Construction Defect Litigation 2025

    Authors: Gary L. Brown

    View this Book

    View more book results for the query "*"

  • L.R. v. Cherry Hill Bd. of Educ.

    Publication Date: 2022-09-29
    Practice Area: Education Law | Public Records
    Industry:
    Court: Appellate Division
    Judge: Judge Mawla
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: A-1819-20

    Plaintiff, individually and on behalf of her daughter, appealed the trial court's order that denied plaintiff's motion to overturn a special master's ruling and remove her case from arbitration, and that dismissed plaintiff's complaint with prejudice.

  • State v. Gomes

    Publication Date: 2022-06-27
    Practice Area: Criminal Law
    Industry:
    Court: Appellate Division
    Judge: Judge Mawla
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Patrick F. Galdieri, II, Assistant Prosecutor, argued the cause for appellants in A-3477-20, A-0581-21, and A-0697-21 (Yolanda Ciccone, Middlesex County Prosecutor, attorney; Patrick F. Galdieri, II, of counsel and on the briefs); Alison Perrone, First Assistant Deputy Public Defender, argued the cause for appellant in A-0198-21 (Joseph E. Krakora, Public Defender, attorney; Alison Perrone, of counsel and on the brief)
    for defendant: Scott A. Gorman argued the cause for respondent in A-3477-20 (Maitlin Maitlin Goodgold Brass & Bennett, attorneys; Scott A. Gorman, of counsel and on the brief); Matthew W. Kelly, Assistant Prosecutor, argued the cause for respondent in A-0198-21 (Robert J. Carroll, Morris County Prosecutor, attorney; Matthew W. Kelly, on the brief); Thomas J. Chaves, attorney for respondent in A-0581-21; Hassen Ibn Abdellah, attorney for respondent in A-0697-21 (Noelle van Baaren, of counsel and on the brief)
    Case Number: A-3477-20; A-0198-21; A-0581-21; A-0697-21

    Decriminalization of Marijuana Possession under CREAMMA Did Not by Implication End PTI Bar for Expunged Conditional Discharges

  • State v. Gomes

    Publication Date: 2022-06-09
    Practice Area: Criminal Law
    Industry:
    Court: Appellate Division
    Judge: Judge Mawla
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: A-0697-21

    The court consolidated appeals regarding the admission of defendants to pretrial intervention when those defendants had prior conditional discharges for marijuana charges.

  • C.E. v. Elizabeth Pub. Sch. Dist.

    Publication Date: 2022-06-06
    Practice Area: Public Records
    Industry: Education | State and Local Government
    Court: Appellate Division
    Judge: Judge Mawla
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Robert F. Varady (La Corte, Bundy, Varady & Kinsella, attorneys; Robert F. Varady, of counsel and on the briefs; Christina M. DiPalo, on the briefs)
    for defendant: Jamie Epstein (Jamie Epstein and Cohn Lifland Pearlman Herrmann & Knopf LLP, attorneys; Walter M. Luers and Jamie Epstein, on the brief)
    Case Number: A-0173-20

    OAL Settlement Agreements Involving School Districts Entered in Court Were Government Records Subject to Disclosure

  • C.E. v. Elizabeth Pub. Sch. Dist.

    Publication Date: 2022-05-18
    Practice Area: Public Records
    Industry:
    Court: Appellate Division
    Judge: Judge Mawla
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: A-0173-20

    Defendants appealed from the judgment entered in favor of plaintiffs in their OPRA action.