NEXT
Case Digests

0 results for 'undefined'

You can use to get even better search results
The People of the State of New York v. Patrick E. Mosher
Publication Date: 2024-10-18
Practice Area: Criminal Appeals
Industry:
Court: Appellate Division, Third Department
Judge: Unsigned Clark, J.P., Pritzker, Ceresia, Fisher and Mackey, JJ.
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: CR-23-0595

New York v. Patrick E. Mosher

State v. Bartolewska
Publication Date: 2024-10-18
Practice Area: Criminal Law
Industry:
Court: Appellate Division
Judge: Per Curiam
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: A-2904-22

Defendant appealed an order affirming her conviction for driving while intoxicated.

J.W. v. Div. of Med. Assistance & Human Serv.
Publication Date: 2024-10-18
Practice Area: Administrative Law | Health Care Law
Industry:
Court: Appellate Division
Judge: Per Curiam
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: A-1835-22

Pro se petitioner appealed the denial of a "fair hearing" under N.J.A.C.

Timothy Halpin v. George M. Banks et al.
Publication Date: 2024-10-18
Practice Area: Civil Appeals
Industry:
Court: Appellate Division, Third Department
Judge: Unsigned Egan Jr., J.P., Clark, Aarons, Reynolds Fitzgerald and Fisher, JJ.
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: CV-23-1185

Timothy Halpin v. George M. Banks et al.

Young v. The State
Publication Date: 2024-10-18
Practice Area: Criminal Law
Industry:
Court: Georgia Court of Appeals
Judge: Presiding Judge Doyle
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Marsha Mignott, (The Mignott Law Group, LLC), Tucker, for appellant.
For defendant: Flynn Broady, Linda Dunikoski, (Cobb County District Attorney’s Office), Marietta, for appellee.
Case number: A24A0793

Court affirms denial of defendant's motion to withdraw a negotiated guilty plea in a robbery case

Law Journal Press | Digital Book Pennsylvania Causes of Action, 12th Edition Authors: GAETAN J. ALFANO, RONALD J. SHAFFER, JOSHUA C. COHAN View this Book

View more book results for the query "*"

Bartell v. Cmty. Coll. of Philadelphia
Publication Date: 2024-10-18
Practice Area: Labor Law
Industry: Education
Court: U.S. District Court for Pennsylvania - Eastern
Judge: District Judge Goldberg
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 19-6056

Elimination of CBA benefits during successor agreement negotiations did not constitute age discrimination in the absence of evidence that employer's advocacy for elimination was not motivated by age. Defendant's motion for summary judgment granted.

Pearlstein v. Commonwealth
Publication Date: 2024-10-18
Practice Area: Tax
Industry:
Court: Supreme Court
Judge: Justice Donohue
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 21 MAP 2023

Deferral of gains from like-kind exchanges of property was not permissible where such a method did not "clearly reflect" a taxpayer's income as defined by the Tax Reform Code. Order of the commonwealth court affirmed.

MJH Life Sci., LLC v. P/S/L Group Am. Inc.
Publication Date: 2024-10-18
Practice Area: Contractual Disputes
Industry:
Court: U.S. District Court for New Jersey
Judge: District Judge Wigenton
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 24-08781 (SDW) (AME)

Plaintiff moved to remand its breach of contract, unfair competition and misappropriation of trade secrets action, arguing lack of subject matter jurisdiction due to incomplete diversity.

Caling v. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc.
Publication Date: 2024-10-18
Practice Area: Personal Injury
Industry:
Court: Appellate Division
Judge: Per Curiam
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: A-0142-23

Plaintiff appealed the trial court's decision granting summary judgment to defendant New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc.

Fabiano v. Christ Movers, LLC
Publication Date: 2024-10-18
Practice Area: Personal Injury
Industry: Cargo and Shipping | Transportation
Court: U.S. District Court for Pennsylvania - Eastern
Judge: District Judge Slomsky
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 2:24-cv-00842

Court declined to strike recklessness allegations at pleadings stage where plaintiff alleged sufficient facts to raise a potential inference of recklessness, including defendant's insistence on performing services late at night and the alleged intoxication of its employees. Defendant's motion to dismiss and strike denied.