NEXT
Case Digests

0 results for 'undefined'

You can use to get even better search results
City Pension Fund for Firefighters & Police Officers in the City of Miami v. The Trade Desk, Inc.
Publication Date: 2022-08-16
Practice Area: Corporate Governance
Industry: Investments and Investment Advisory
Court: Court of Chancery
Judge: Vice Chancellor Fioravanti
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Gregory V. Varallo, Andrew E. Blumberg, Daniel E. Meyer, Bernstein Litowitz Berger & Grossmann LLP, Wilmington, DE; Mark Lebovitch, Reuben Gottlieb, Jeroen van Kwawegen, Bernstein Litowitz Berger & Grossmann LLP, New York, NY; Jeremy Friedman, David Tejtel, Julie Palley, Friedman Oster & Tejtel PLLC, Bedford Hills, NY for plaintiff.
For defendant: William M. Lafferty, Ryan D. Stottmann, Sabrina Hendershot, Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP, Wilmington, DE; Peter J. Walsh, Jr., Jacqueline A. Rogers, Abraham C. Schneider, Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP, Wilmington, DE; Matthew Rawlinson, Latham & Watkins LLP, Menlo Park, CA; Colleen Smith, Latham & Watkins LLP, San Diego, CA; Kristin Murphy, Latham & Watkins LLP, Costa Mesa, CA; Brad D. Sorrels, Shannon E. German, Benjamin M. Potts, Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, P.C., Wilmington, DE; David J. Berger, Steven M. Guggenheim, Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, P.C., Palo Alto, CA; S. Toni Wormald, Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, P.C., San Francisco, CA for defendants.
Case number: D69918

Interested transaction benefitting controlling stockholder was subject to business judgment review under MFW framework where special committee had a majority of disinterested directors and proxy adequately disclosed the controller's motivation for proposing the transaction.

ADS Envtl. Inc. v. Twp. of Bethlehem
Publication Date: 2022-08-16
Practice Area: Administrative Law | Land Use and Planning
Industry:
Court: Appellate Division
Judge: Per Curiam
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: A-2545-20

Defendants appealed the reversal of planning board's denial of plaintiffs' site plan and variance application.

Resolution Mgmt. Consultants v. Design One Bldg. Sys, Inc.
Publication Date: 2022-08-16
Practice Area: Civil Procedure | Contracts
Industry:
Court: U.S. District Court for New Jersey
Judge: District Judge Kugler
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 21-17859 (RBK/AMD)

Defendants moved to set aside the default judgment.

Benipal v. Tri-State Petro, Inc.
Publication Date: 2022-08-16
Practice Area: Real Estate
Industry:
Court: Appellate Division
Judge: Per Curiam
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: A-2306-19

Plaintiffs appealed from the judgment of the trial court.

City and County of San Francisco v. Garland
Publication Date: 2022-08-16
Practice Area: Civil Appeals | Government | Immigration Law
Industry: Federal Government | State and Local Government
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Judge: Judge S.R. Thomas
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 19-15947

Facial challenges to 8 U.S.C. §§1373 and 1644 not justiciable

Law Journal Press | Digital Book Pennsylvania Causes of Action, 12th Edition Authors: GAETAN J. ALFANO, RONALD J. SHAFFER, JOSHUA C. COHAN View this Book

View more book results for the query "*"

Fabiano-Riccio v. Citizens Options Unlimited, Inc.
Publication Date: 2022-08-16
Practice Area: Employment Litigation
Industry:
Court: Supreme Court, Westchester
Judge: Justice William J. Giacomo
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: For Plaintiff: John W. Keegan Jr., Esq. of Keegan, Keegan & Strutt PLLC.
For defendant: For Defendant: Karl E. Daniel, Esq. of Kenney Shelton Liptak Novak LLP.
Case number: 57973/2021

Defendant Compelled to Disclose Non-Privileged Information in Patient's Medical Record

Munoz v. Patel
Publication Date: 2022-08-16
Practice Area: Contractual Disputes
Industry: Hospitality and Lodging | Real Estate
Court: Court of Appeal, 4th District
Judge: Presiding Justice McConnell
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: D078215

Alleged bait and switch with contract constitutes "fraud in the execution"

Nwaohia v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Publication Date: 2022-08-16
Practice Area: Civil Rights
Industry:
Court: U.S. District Court for New Jersey
Judge: District Judge Hillman
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 1:18-cv-10648-NLH

Plaintiff moved for reconsideration of grant of summary judgment to defendants in plaintiff's New Jersey Law Against Discrimination action.

Giusiana v. City of Buffalo
Publication Date: 2022-08-16
Practice Area: Civil Procedure
Industry:
Court: Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Judge: Per Curiam
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: For Plaintiff-Respondent: John A. Collins of Counsel, Lipsitz Green Scime Cambria LLP, Buffalo.
For defendant: For Defendants-Appellants and Third-Party Plaintiffs-Appellants In Action No. 2.: William P. Mathewson of Counsel, Timothy A. Ball, Corporation Counsel, Buffalo. For Third-Party Defendant-Respondent-Appellant In Action No. 2 and Defendants-Appellants In Action No. 3.: Timothy S. Brennan of Counsel, Phelan, Phelan & Danek, LLP, Albany.
Case number: 450 CA 21-00277

Plaintiff Not Required to Show Defendant Owed Him Special Duty While in Police Custody

Steward Health Care Sys, LLC v. Tenet Bus. Serv. Corp.
Publication Date: 2022-08-16
Practice Area: Contracts
Industry: Health Care
Court: Court of Chancery
Judge: Vice Chancellor Glasscock
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Michael A. Barlow and Adam K. Schulman, Abrams & Bayliss LLP, Wilmington, DE; Anthony Bongiorno and Jessica Reese, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP, Boston, MA; Rollo C. Baker IV, Jared Ruocco, and Eric White, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP, New York, NY for plaintiffs.
For defendant: Lewis H. Lazarus, K. Tyler O’Connell, Albert J. Carroll, and Barnaby Grzaslewicz, Morris James LLP, Wilmington, DE; Stephen C. Hackney, P.C., Timothy W. Knapp, P.C., and Brendan E. Ryan, Kirkland & Ellis LLP, Chicago, IL for defendants.
Case number: D69921

In lieu of a demonstration of likelihood of success on the merits, court granted preliminary injunctive relief compelling specific performance, conditioned on plaintiffs' posting of a bond sufficient to cover the service fees defendants were owed under the parties contract.