Deliberations Set to Restart Monday After Menendez Juror Is Excused
Jurors in the corruption trial of U.S. Sen. Bob Menendez, D-New Jersey, and Florida eye doctor Salomon Melgen are set to resume deliberations on Monday after failing to reach a verdict in their first three days behind closed doors.
November 09, 2017 at 07:12 PM
3 minute read
Jurors in the corruption trial of U.S. Sen. Bob Menendez, D-New Jersey, and Florida eye doctor Salomon Melgen are set to resume deliberations on Monday after failing to reach a verdict in their first three days behind closed doors.
Jurors have the day off on Friday for Veterans Day. On Monday the jurors will start deliberations from the beginning once an alternate juror is seated to replace another who was excused due to vacation plans. During the trial's outset, in early September, the judge promised the juror she would not miss her pre-planned vacation, in an apparent underestimation of how long the trial would take.
The excused juror said she felt the senator was not guilty and that the majority of jurors agreed with her, according to an article from NorthJersey.com that was emailed to reporters by Menendez's campaign late Thursday.
The juror, identified as Evelyn Arroyo-Maultsby, said she believes the trial will end in a hung jury, and described the atmosphere in the jury room as “very stressful,” the article said.
Arroyo-Maultsby said, according to the report, said the prosecution was “railroading” Menendez. “When they said that it was going to be conspiracy, that they planned this, that's to me, I don't see that. That's a friendship.”
On Tuesday, U.S. District Judge William Walls of the District of New Jersey received a note from the jury, seeking clarification on the role of a senator and a repeat of closing comments on that subject from Abbe Lowell, Menendez's lawyer. Walls denied the requests on the grounds that a lawyer's comments are not evidence.
The question was an apparent reference to Lowell's comment that Menendez “did not have the power to fix the issues in the agencies by himself. In other words, he could ask people to look at, please consider, give consideration for a visa. At the end of the day, it was their decision to make.”
Prosecutors have portrayed Menendez as selling his influence in exchange for a lavish lifestyle he could not afford, while the defense in the case has maintained that the senator has benefited from Melgen's generosity because the two are friends.
The indictment charges that Menendez accepted nearly $1 million in gifts and campaign contributions from Melgen, including lodgings at luxury hotels and flights in Melgen's private jet and on commercial airlines. The indictment claims that Menendez's assistance to Melgen in a dispute with the Medicare program and the senator's attempts to advocate with federal officials on behalf of Melgen's port security business were provided in exchange for the gifts. The indictment also charges that Menendez helped obtain U.S. visas for three friends of Melgen.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHit by Mail Truck: Man Agrees to $1.85M Settlement for Spinal Injuries
Appellate Div. Follows Fed Reasoning on Recusal for Legislator-Turned-Judge
4 minute readChiesa Shahinian Bolsters Corporate Practice With 5 From Newark Boutique
5 minute readOn the Move and After Hours: Brach Eichler; Cooper Levenson; Marshall Dennehey; Archer; Sills Cummis
7 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250