Judge Tosses $417M Talc Verdict in California Court
A Los Angeles Superior Court judge has tossed a record $417 million talcum powder verdict after finding “serious misconduct” on the part of the…
October 20, 2017 at 09:33 PM
16 minute read
A Los Angeles Superior Court judge has tossed a record $417 million talcum powder verdict after finding “serious misconduct” on the part of the jury and insufficient evidence at trial.
Judge Maren Nelson's order, issued late Friday, granted a motion for new trial and a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict for Johnson & Johnson. A jury on Aug. 21 had found Johnson & Johnson failed to warn that its talcum powder products caused ovarian cancer.
But Nelson, in a 51-page decision, detailed a host of problems with the case, including the jury's consideration of attorney fees and taxes in its calculation of $70 million in compensatory damages.
“An agreement to exclude improper items of compensation such as taxes and fees in a verdict is improper, particularly where the jury was instructed as to what they could consider,” she wrote. “On the evidence here the court is constrained to conclude that consideration of items of damages such as taxes and fees was serious misconduct, giving rise to a presumption of prejudice.”
She also found the damages—$70 million in non-economic damages and $347 million in punitive damages—excessive.
The decision is a win for Johnson & Johnson's lead attorneys, Bart Williams and Manuel Cachán of Proskauer Rose.
“We are pleased with Judge Nelson's ruling today,” Johnson & Johnson spokeswoman Carol Goodrich wrote in an emailed statement on Friday afternoon. “Ovarian cancer is a devastating disease—but it is not caused by the cosmetic-grade talc we have used in Johnson's Baby Powder for decades. The science is clear and we will continue to defend the safety of Johnson's Baby Powder as we prepare for additional trials in the U.S.”
Mark Robinson of Robinson Calcagnie in Newport Beach, California, who represented the plaintiff, Eva Echeverria, said he would file an appeal immediately.
“We disagree with the court's decision,” he said in a statement. “A jury of Ms. Echeverria's peers found The Johnson and Johnson defendants liable. We will ask the appellate court to uphold this jury's verdict. We will continue to fight on behalf of all women who have been impacted by this dangerous product.”
Nelson, who heard oral arguments on Johnson & Johnson's posttrial motions last week, had been weighing whether to toss the verdict due to alleged juror misconduct or based on trial exhibits that failed to prove punitive damages.
The verdict was the first talcum powder trial in California. Previous verdicts totaling more than $300 million had come from Missouri juries, including a $72 million award that a Missouri Court of Appeals tossed on Wednesday.
Echeverria was diagnosed with ovarian cancer in 2007 after decades of using Johnson & Johnson's talcum powder products. She died after the trial.
A Los Angeles Superior Court judge has tossed a record $417 million talcum powder verdict after finding “serious misconduct” on the part of the jury and insufficient evidence at trial.
Judge Maren Nelson's order, issued late Friday, granted a motion for new trial and a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict for
But Nelson, in a 51-page decision, detailed a host of problems with the case, including the jury's consideration of attorney fees and taxes in its calculation of $70 million in compensatory damages.
“An agreement to exclude improper items of compensation such as taxes and fees in a verdict is improper, particularly where the jury was instructed as to what they could consider,” she wrote. “On the evidence here the court is constrained to conclude that consideration of items of damages such as taxes and fees was serious misconduct, giving rise to a presumption of prejudice.”
She also found the damages—$70 million in non-economic damages and $347 million in punitive damages—excessive.
The decision is a win for
“We are pleased with Judge Nelson's ruling today,”
Mark Robinson of
“We disagree with the court's decision,” he said in a statement. “A jury of Ms. Echeverria's peers found The
Nelson, who heard oral arguments on
The verdict was the first talcum powder trial in California. Previous verdicts totaling more than $300 million had come from Missouri juries, including a $72 million award that a Missouri Court of Appeals tossed on Wednesday.
Echeverria was diagnosed with ovarian cancer in 2007 after decades of using
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHershey's 'Bubble Yum' Hit With Consumer Class Action for Allegedly Containing 'Forever Chemicals'
Los Angeles Secures $35M Settlement From Monsanto in Water Contamination Lawsuit
Bonta, Environmental Groups Sue Exxon Mobil Over Plastic Recycling Claims
4 minute readHarvard College and Ward, Smith & Hill File Patent Infringement Suit Against Samsung
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Why Kramer Levin Decided to Merge
- 2Judicial Ethics Opinion 24-61
- 3Decision of the Day: School District's Probe Was a 'Sham'; Title IX Administrator Showed Sex-Based Bias
- 4US Magistrate Judge Embry Kidd Confirmed to 11th Circuit
- 5Shaq Signs $11 Million Settlement to Resolve Astrals Investor Claims
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250